It's amazing to think that at the end of 2016, more than 27 years since I first saw Phish live, I have so much closer a connection with the band members than ever before. For instance, when Trey Anastasio took the stage with his bandmates ("the boys") Thursday night at Madison Square Garden, I saw instantly that I own the same hoodie Trey was wearing.
Phish's most recent concerts were a four-night run in Las Vegas, and they'd opened the first three of those shows with originals written for and debuted at their 2014 Haunted House performance. Tonight, another pattern emerged. For the second straight show of the current four-night run, they opened with an a cappella number: "Sweet Adeline," which Phish hadn't dusted off since needing it to make up the numbers at the S show at Dick's in 2011. If this trend continues ... aaayyyyyy. Here's hoping for a "Free Bird" tomorrow night.
The number of bustouts last night and to start tonight's show brought Phish near to their personal best for songs played in a year, if you're into that kind of thing. The mark to shoot for (set in 2010) was 251. They took the stage tonight at 245 but the meter started running right away. After "Adeline" (song 246) came "Peaches en Regalia" (247), unseen since St. Louis in August of 2012 and probably not played to Gail Zappa's satisfaction, or Dweezil's, or Moon's, but still nice to hear.
You can't do better with "Mike's Groove" these days than as a first-quarter fire-starter, and the riff still retains the power to combust an arena crowd. Dropping into the jam, Trey was patient and exploratory, his tone immaculate. Trey's habit of tinkering with his rig is something we joke about a lot around Phish.net HQ, all in good fun (e.g., "Can you believe this guy?" "No freakin’ way he did it again!" "What's with the dang pedals he's only got two feet?!?!"), but he was clear, crisp, and incisive all night.
During "Mike's" Page egged on Trey's instinct to jam by moving over to Lil Punkin, his adorable tangerine-colored Wurlitzer electric piano. (V.O.: Watch out, this pint-sized keyboard packs a powerful punch!) The Wurlitzer tone brought in a slightly spacier vibe, if only for a minute. Trey and Page cut off the jam together, Page pivoting back to the grand piano. The "Mike's" climax that followed is basically flames and everything you'd want. After that they played "Secret Smile" (248), and then "Weekapaug Groove" after "Secret Smile." Want more details? Well, the "Secret Smile" arrangement seems different; I haven't gone back to compare and I kind of don't love the song that much, but it seems like tonight's arrangement was in a different key and carried more by Page on the piano. Consider this an invitation to relisten to older versions and mock in the comments, but just know this: you'll be mocking me about an off-the-cuff opinion on the Phish song "Secret Smile."
The first set didn't deliver a whole lot after that, apart from yet more bustouts: "Roses Are Free" (249), last seen at the lackluster Dick's opener in 2015, and "Brian & Robert" (250), untouched since a rarity-filled first set at Alpine Valley that same summer. In between them, Page took an extra chorus on his "Poor Heart" solo, or maybe just applied a little extra mustard.
Then, the inevitable happened: Phish tied what is, let's be honest, possibly the most legendary mark in jamband-related statistical analysis. Song 251 was "Beauty of a Broken Heart," a neglected mid-tempo Page McConnell pop tune with a lovely circular chord structure. I gotta say they nailed it, with Trey leaning into his solo and leading an energetic little jam.
The first set's potential vehicles for improvisation paid off only modestly. "46 Days" did no noticeable damage in any direction. "Theme" saw a disastrous effort from Trey on the bridge, where he basically abandoned any attempt to play his part. It's admittedly a difficult part to play, even by the standards of a repertoire filled with difficult parts, but you would think Trey would want to get it right, or at least more right than that. Anyway, as is often the case with Trey, what the composed section tooketh away, the jam gaveth back. The ensuing improvisation was pleasant and soaring, swooping down from sunlight into the shadow of canyon walls, back out again, finally tumbling back to earth as Trey fiddled around with the "Dave's Energy Guide" riff. The set-closing "Split Open and Melt" was pretty tasty, but I started wishing for more bass, and realized I hadn't thought about Mike Gordon too much during the show so far. Trey dominated the "Split," loading up the pitch shifter and spraying little barbed slashes of guitar around the arena. It stayed languid, never became frenetic, and at the end the four of them dropped on a dime back into the tricky meter of the "Split" jam.
I'm told there are really good burgers somewhere on the lower level of MSG, by the way. They'll cook them medium rare to order. That's all I know. I wish I could tell you more.
Phish loves to open the second set with "Down with Disease," and tonight's version quieted from a standard full-band "Disease" jam into a conversation between Trey and Page. As he'd done before in "Mike's," Page moved to Lil Punkin. Trey heard something in his chords and off the two of them went into a gorgeous two-chord plagal bliss jam straight out of fall 2013. Fish followed, Mike was a step back again. They feinted at "Under Pressure" but no time for that; the band dropped back, almost out, leaving Trey to noodle mellifluously out on his own. They think about joining back in, and gradually do, and a neat little groove starts to develop. But by this point Trey's been heavily flirting with the melody for "What's the Use?," and he smoothly flows right in.
I gotta be greedy and say I wish they'd graced us with a little more of the "Disease" jam, which had the band locked in and reacting to each other. But "What's the Use?" is an uncommonly powerful rock instrumental, and you wanna talk about tone -- sweet all night, delicious on the preceding DwD, Trey's guitar attains its highest and best sonic form right here. You can understand why Trey would be in a bit of a hurry to show it off.
Unlike "Disease," Phish has never figured out how to take "Fuego" deep consistently, and that didn't change tonight. This version of "Fuego" was the show in microcosm. Mike forgot his entrance; they got through the composition pretty well; then, as they approached the Jam/Don't Jam decision point, Trey threw out a few jabbing, funky chords, inviting someone to follow. Nobody bit, and with the rest of the band drifting, Trey backed off. There was this weird rudderless moment, with nobody able to muster the will to move in any direction, four swimmers treading water. Then Trey started some other song, I forget which. Later on, the swamp-prog Joy standout "Twenty Years Later" was plodding toward its unremarkable conclusion when Trey started "Kung" (252 and the record! balloons fell from the ceiling in each of Phish's four tour buses), and this worked up a good deal of momentum over the "20YL" riff. "Makisupa Policeman" featured another vaping joke and another percussion segment.
I gotta say something about this issue. I really don't care for the percussion jams. I don't get it. I was never a Deadhead when the Dead existed, but every Deadhead I knew uniformly treated "Drums" as an opportunity to visit the trough under the stands and engage in some focused micturition. I don't know anybody who listens to a drum solo on tape. It may not have happened, ever. I hear you: this is something different, Trey's had a percussion kit before, this too shall pass, shut the fuck up buddy. But for me, "Rhythm Devilz" (as this segment should be called) is dead time. I felt like I was watching the part of the Sunday Night Football blowout where Al Michaels is talking about what a field goal could do to the over-under.
The greatest "Harry Hood" second-set closer of all time, or even the recent approximations circa summer 2014, couldn't drag this great, awesome, fun time with friends but below-average Phish show into the win column, but this "Hood" was well worth a listen. It was lovely, fiery, energetic, beautiful, all the things we love about this great piece of music as played by these four musicians.
Also, the new perimeter spotlights inside the arena are really cool and suggest that the rumors of an MSG residency for Phish in 2017 might be right. With lighting designer and director Chris Kuroda in charge of Rangers and Knicks games at MSG, the band has a chance to turn the World's Most Famous Arena into its own rock show test laboratory. If next summer sees 10, or 12, or 15 Phish shows on Broadway, most of them are sure to be better than tonight. As will tomorrow night and the night after that, no doubt.
If you liked this blog post, one way you could "like" it is to make a donation to The Mockingbird Foundation, the sponsor of Phish.net. Support music education for children, and you just might change the world.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
It was like nothing had changed at all (Mike still seems to get nervous and lose all sense of rhythm & funk when it's his turn to solo, lol.)!
Glad to see people are still enjoying them, (and presumably new fans as well).
The peaks of last night were some of the best I've seen in my 22 years of enjoying this band. Can't wait for tonight!
I understand everyone has a different perspective how they see things in life. One thing I can say, this author might have been in a different mindset where the brain was possibly not in the "Right Frame of Mind". Something must of have set this person off because 14 out of 15 people that made a comment in this thread seems to disagree with the author.
To the phish.net crew, (Scott, Phil and all of the others that is part of the Mockingbird Foundation), Please Do Not Ask Sausage Mahoney to ever write a review again.....
Also, perhaps tapping Larry King to write this review would have elicited a more favorable reaction from fans.
Thank baby Jesus they didn't encore with Show of Life, for sausagemahoney's sake.
After reading countless posts of praise on the forum, reading this review made me feel like Phish isn't a good band at all anymore. I guess I missed the hoopla over why Meatstick is the most terrible song ever now, but to joke it into oblivion by not even listing it by name is sad. At this point I don't even know what qualifies as a "good" Phish song. Or a "good" Phish show. But there are two kinds of fans emerging and 2016 has brought them out: you are either a fan that only likes shows that have one 20+ minute jam, no Marimba/drum jam, and no ballads; or, you are a fan that likes crap.
I'm the fan that likes crap.
i hope tonight is better then that
4) there's good and bad ways to direct harsh criticism at a show...I don't ever personally partake in talking much shit about my fav. band, because I'm in total surrender to the PHilosophy that whatever happens at a Phish show is what that show's about....but I definitely (academically) appreciate others' constructive criticism when it's done the "right way," see: @noob100 or many other of this site's regular contributors....still, appreciate your efforts and respect your point of view OP, but sheesh
I was at this show but maybe it was a different show, because this wasn't my experience at all.
Another point; anyone who thinks that the only people who's review counts are those in attendance at the show are quite wrong. It's difficult to pay attention to 100% of a show while also trying to dance, amuse oneself with substances, chat with friends, and all the other activities that come along with being there. Those distractions aren't really an issue on one's couch, and I suspect that, many times, a couch viewer may have a more valuable perspective on, at the very least, the music that was played, if not the "vibe in the room."
Another point; how many of us were at 12.31.95? Few, I'd wager. Its a legendary show in the history of Phish and one that any fan ought to have listened to quite a bit. I've listened to it enough times to know why saying "turning knobs, turning levers all day," when timed well, is hilarious. I think my perspective on the music of that show is pretty valid, and fuck anyone who disagrees with me because I wasn't there...that's an idiotic attitude.
Well done OP; I hope to read your work again.
I think you may be underestimating the SOAM a tad. Might be worth a playback.
That being said, so much of a show is about headspace. Some nights we're in sync w the band and other times we are swimming upstream of each other. I'd be curious if you still think this way about the show after some distance from it. Cheers/Jerz
There's no such thing as a show that slays on tape that didn't slay in person. But the opposite is definitely not true.
I've often thought that for objectivity's sake, reviews should ONLY be conducted via webcast or good quality audio recording. All the other things mentioned above (drugs, vibe, energy, friends) spoil the experiment.
Yeah, Fuego hasn't gone full-jam the way I'd enjoy it to, but this was another nice one. When my only complaints are that I wish Roses was jammed instead of straight (no chaser) and that I wish SOAM (as a set closer) had a little more direction, I'd call it a damn solid show. It didn't have the "peak jam" or grand-slam of some of my other favorite 3.0 shows but it was a steady barrage of doubles off the wall, everything well played. Even Secret Smile (usually a break for me but I sat and listened and enjoyed).
YMMV but I had a hell of a time last night on my own couch tour.
I also thank the reviewer for presenting an opportunity for me to comment on something that has been gnawing at me since the day after the second show in Grand Prairie on the fall tour, a show that the consensus has determined to be the "worst" show of the year (and, indeed, the "worst" since 7/19/2013).
I attended all three shows at Dick's and the last two in Vegas as well as the two in Grand Prairie. The Dick's and Vegas shows are rated among the best of the year and rightfully so. But of all the shows I attended in person this year (or last, for that matter) I had the best time at the Grand Prairie show. They played Lifeboy, which is a song I love and never expected to witness in person. They busted out Foam, and Meatstick was an absolute blast--it was a moment of pure joy for me to watch this big dude in the row in front of me flawlessly execute the silly dance steps. And then during Taste I closed my eyes, let the music wash over me, and I had a near out-of-body experience of absolute ecstasy. For me, it was hose to the max.
Now, I have not gone back to re-listen to that show. I have re-listened to the Vegas and Dick's shows multiple times. I get why someone looking over the dozens of shows from this year would not bother to listen to Grand Prairie night two. And I get why the highly rated shows are highly rated--there are some awesome jams, great setflow, and tight playing in those shows that makes them worthy of multiple listens.
But my point is this: the experience of being at a Phish show is qualitatively different from the experience of watching one from the living room or streaming the audio after-the-fact on Livephish+. I get why people who were not at the show last night (or the show I attended in Grand Prairie) might have a very different response to it than the folks who were there. Heck, I get why the responses of two people who were both there might be different (the first night of Dick's this year was hard to really enjoy after some Chad in the row behind us threw up on my wife's back just before the first intermission--the second-set Tweezer may have been awesome, but for us? Not so much. Needless to say we bailed early).
For these reasons I tend to read reviews of shows primarily to see if there were any stand-out songs, which is useful information. But the reviewer's overall impression of a show as "below average" or "drowning" or whatever? Yeah, I don't really care about that because I know from personal experience that a five-star show can fail to connect with me if circumstances conspire against it and a "2.6" show can provide me with one of the best experiences I have ever had.
I would prefer if reviewers would stick to observations about the quality of play, whether the band seemed to be in synch and grooving, and how the set flowed rather than the more subjective things like "I hate when Trey plays percussion" or "there were no long jams" or "I hate Fuckerpants." The former criticisms may help someone decide if it is a show worth giving a listen; the latter provide no real value. It's like a movie reviewer saying "La La Land sucks because I hate musicals so don't go see it." Sometimes reviews here have a tendency to veer toward that kind of a thing ("the second set was ruined because they played three songs I hate").
I've enjoyed every review I've ever read on this website until 5 minutes ago.
Reviewer wasn't that far off though. I enjoyed the MELT, DWD/WTU was solid, Kung was interesting and it was nice to see Trey put a peak on Hood again
But overall pretty average in the scheme of things
3/5
I'm re-watching it now for the third time and nop... not drowning at all. But yeah, everyone has a point of view, right?! No harm!
1) "short song descriptions + 2nd set didn't really take off"
2) "short song descriptions + 2nd set totally took off."
Everyone has different expectations for a show, especially based on their method of listening- live stream, live in person, or post-show listen.
This review just needs an editor. Wednesday's review didn't post till well after Noon the following day, and was cleaner in its direction and tone. This one is negative in the headline, but doesn't dig into "why" until paragraph #11. And it's a valid claim too, the "rudderless moments" and "treading water." But there's not enough explanation.
There were highs and lows last night. But wading through this review, it's hard to tell how the hell the writer* reaches that conclusion. Was it "great, awesome, fun time with friends but below-average" or several other conflicting adjectives? I think a middle school English teacher just went into rehab.
*can we get some female writers, pretty please?
It seems the reviewer has no real clue about what is going on.
The reviewer missed it for sure !
Focused on the BS not the music
READ THE BOOK !
Don't get drums? WOW
Not floating upon the waves for sure
This review is propaganda.
The show rocked from start to finish.
AWESOME 2 sets.
My review after 27 years of PHISH !
Peace & Love to you reviewer.
Hope you start really listening next time round the wheel.
2) Trey flubbed a guitar part once or twice, get over it - the man is human and played music non-stop without looking at a chart for 2.5 hours. He might have played 500,000 notes last night, maybe 3 million, I don't know. So if 5 or 6 were wrong, who cares.
3) the band was loose and having fun, trading smiles all night - this always makes for good music. After 30 years, they still find ways to keep the shows interesting, whether its an a capella opener, improved light show, or by playing 4 songs that havn't been played in almost 200 shows. The fact that their repitoire is as deep as it currently is and they played over 250 different unique songs this year alone is probably more songs than any 5 bands combined will play over the course of the same period. Think about that for a second.
4) People need to have realistic expectations from these 4 guys. Just go and listen to the music, relax, and forget about rankings, stats, "good" "average-good" 2.0, 3.0 Type I jams, and all the other BS terms that get thrown around to try to catalog something that needs no taxonomy. Its about the music and the vibe. As its been said, just surrender to the phlow.
Ive never posted on this site in the 22 years ive followed it, but I just couldn't help commenting on what was an incredible night of music and fun. Happy and healthy new year to all.
But, bro, how are you gonna bring up Hood's Summer 2014 and then say they "never" figured out how to jam out Fuego? 7/4/14 didn't do it for you? 7/8? 7/30?
http://phish.net/blog/1313651459/larry-kings-phish-news.html
http://phish.net/blog/1377573387/larry-kings-phish-news.html
You may not agree with or like this review, but maybe, just maybe, take it with a grain of salt. These are just words that someone posted on the internet.
I am finding it a fine show. How many great Hoods have we had over the last two years? Pretty much all of them but last night the jam didn't go into the usual slightly to quite dark and instead just stayed in the major two chords and just percolated with Trey absolutely blazing. Easily the highlight of the show.
For anyone who hasn't already seen this http://liveforlivemusic.com/news/internet-loving-kid-phish-stream because of Hood.
Wouldn't it stand to reason that someone who's seen 27 years worth of Phish shows might have developed some criteria on how to differentiate shows? Apparently, the reviewer is a fan of jams where the band melds together, locks in, and takes the song to a special place. And also can recognize and appreciate when the band is totally nailing all the composed, structured sections. I'm sure there's an element of setlist flow and song choice in his rubric too.
Obviously, checking every single one of those boxes isn't gunna happen every night. That's why Phish is special -- there are highs and lows, and the contrast between the two make the whole experience dynamic, compelling and ever-changing.
Whether you're talking about a specific song, a show, a tour, or even the entire 30+ year history of the band in general, Planet Phish is scarred by valleys and punctuated by peaks. The low points make us lust for the heights, which are thus that much more enjoyable and meaningful because of the path we've climbed to reach them.
Yes, the Phish concert experience is somewhat constant -- happy people, feel-good jams, mind-blowing lights, plenty of booze and what-have-you, and a shared history/purpose with a diverse but like-minded community. All of it adds up to a wonderful, inimitable escape.
If that's what keeps bringing you back, and you're not too concerned with critically analyzing the nuances of a specific jam/show/tour, well, there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT. There is no rule book on how to enjoy Phish. Part of the appeal of the band is that fans can appreciate Phish on so many different levels. On that note, if you're looking for a show review that simply re-lives the previous night's feel-good, unadulterated joy, check out a recap on Jambase or Relix.
Conversely, if you acknowledge that not all shows are created equal -- at least beyond the aforementioned constants of the live Phish experience -- and you want to place a specific song/jam/show in a larger context, then you're lucky to have a critical, informed source like Phish.net to scour for real, incisive opinions.
This shouldn't be like McCarthy's America, where anyone who didn't do the Pledge of Allegiance 5x per day would be accused of being a communist. It's okay to acknowledge that some shows are better than others. It doesn't make you "jaded" or a "hater" or any less of a fan than the next guy. None of us would be here if we didn't love this band, if we weren't invested it in enough to log onto the website the next day and discuss it all with others.
If every single show you go to is better than the last, the new :best night of your life", maybe these reviews are not for you. Again, hit up Relix or Jambase for a recap that helps you relive every special nugget of every special night in as glorious a fashion as you remember.
If you want a more nuanced, critical and honest opinion on the subtleties of each show -- subtleties that don't matter to every fan -- then thank Icculus that we have Phish.net.
I still had an amazing time. I'm sure the author had a great time as well. Phish shows are always a great time. If your feelings are hurt because of this review, maybe you just haven't seen or heard enough great Phish shows? Maybe you need a thicker skin? Maybe you're not a good critical listener? Maybe you need a nice sober listen to the recording? To say last night was a great night of Phish music is comical.
The guy's handle is Sausage. I suspect he is aware that he sometimes is a bit of a dick when he reviews shows. Lighten up, laugh, disagree. Jaded vets are funny if you don't take them too seriously, and buried in all the sarcasm and negativity and mockery is usually some truth. Enjoy the shows and each other, there is enough hate out there without us getting all pissed off at each other about show reviews.
just because someone doesn't like a particular outing doesn't mean they're wrong. you liked? good for you, glad you enjoyed. BUT, for everyone that jumped down sausage's throat, ask yourself this. have you ever seen a phish show you DIDN'T like? you think and feel every show is good to great, how would you know?
get over yourselves, sausage didn't like the show. as stated, bfd.
2016 is a scary year. If there is ever a time for unity, it's now. Phish kids, let's form a Rebel Alliance.
TO THE RED HEAD GIRL: I hope you are reading this and feel ashamed of what you did. You sent me away with no hesitation and complete lack of care. Your sense of entitlement is gross. You are not better than anyone in that arena and deserve no more and no less, despite the fact that this was probably your 10,000th show. The music doesn't belong the band and it sure as hell doesn't belong to you. It belongs to EVERYONE!
TO BERNIE: You are the man. I was alone and you were cool enough and kind enough to share with me, dance with me, and live up to what this band is really about. I had a great show in the end but felt the need to address the bullying and dictatorship of the Rail Crew.
But either way, I do have to appreciate a Zappa pun in the title of the review of a show where Phish played Peaches. I don't know if SausageMahoney wrote the headline themselves, but whoever did, good job!
A few things:
1) If you had an awesome time at a show and someone says it wasn't the best show by the band, who cares? You had an awesome time - do you really need the cherry on top that is some stranger validating your opinion?
2) If I was more eloquent in my late teens and forced to submit a review to a website by the next morning, I would have written a similarly non-purple review of the show I attended on 10/02/99 or 02/20/2003. At the time, I was really let down by both of those shows and it would have shown. Lo and behold, seventeen and fourteen years later, I'd give a left nut (I have two) to revisit either of those shows for just one of what I now believe are multiple canonical jams.
What I'm saying is; maybe in time, the reviewer will come to see things the way you do. Or, maybe you'll see things the way he does.
3) The Lions suck.
i respect anyone who has the courage to say they saw a phish show and it sucked because you just KNOW all the knob-slobbing dickheads are going to come out in full force. it's an OPINION. if you liked the show, great. Like it. It doesn't mean this dude was wrong. So sick of hearing the flaming.
Beyond that? Disease could've been predicted as soon as it didn't open the second-set the night before, and while pretty fun wasn't "crushing" by Disease-standards. The damn song has been a favorite of mine for years, and dare I say I'm tiring of its placement-predictability(lol- its only been opening second sets for like 20 years); 7/27/14's placement of Disease was a freaking breath of fresh air, IMO....but I digress. Sheeyit, I'm even harsher than Mahoney on WTU?; while I do love the song, its an almost guaranteed handful-of-ever-predictable-never-changing minutes in any set. Fuego is a legit stadium-rocker, but it's jam potential has been realized so infrequently it is also bordering on "same-ol', same-ol'". Meatstick can be fun, but pretty much never changes. I've been waiting for 20YL to do SOMETHING since 10/29/13, and am still holding my breath after last night, even w/ a Kung-injection. Makisupa can ALSO be fun, but I was at Champaign '97, so there's that. Hood is a classic, ALWAYS, but there again, last night's wasn't ALL that. I really enjoyed how Hood took a turn in '14 to a more rockin'-jam vehicle as opposed to "touching", altho I love all Hoods.
Phew. Whatever, that's my $0.02, and I haven't written more than like 3-4 of these damn things in all my years on .net. I gotta say, tho, after 22yrs of phish, its rare I don't feel at least similarly to the gang here, and appreciate their efforts.
12/28 was way better, and this was a decent show. Not fantastic. Endless knob-slobbing praise is for suckers. This is my favorite band. You can't have the stellar w/o the occasional stinker. 2016 was rife w/ 'meh' moments. Still my favorite band. I'm now going to pay more attention to tonight's show (12/30), 'cuz I've been penning this stupid thing for 20mins now and they just rocked Gin. Y'all enjoy the run. -r
The problem with this review isn't simply that it isn't a glowing positive review. Of course everybody has a right to state their honest opinion, and of course some Phish shows are better than others. They can't all be 5 stars. Most reasonable fans agree with all that. That's not the problem.
The problem is that the author seems to embody a certain kind of entitled douchebag vet in an almost Platonic sense, as if he were The Jaded Vet in archetype form. Most fans don't like that guy, and when you play that character to the hilt the way this guy did in this review, people are going to react in a strong way.
Short version: Even if you didn't like the show, you don't have to be such a dick about it.
-Reviwers speech from the 2045 wedding of his 5th child-
show was sub-par
reviewer was generous
some of you fluffers should take off your rose-tinted glasses and re-listen
kung and a solid hood can't save a set
'Fuego' is such great jam material, too! As in the original 'Limb by Limb' arrangement, they're coming out of the composed section/vocals on a *downward* trajectory, so to speak, in an interesting texture, at an easy tempo. It's probably not a matter of 'figuring it out,' so to speak. (I don't assume you meant that literally.) I kinda wish Fish'd restore his original subtle drums in the outro, to give the jam someplace *concrete* to be instead of 'ambling generic rock.'
Maybe it's nothing more than their attention moving to different batches of songs from tour to tour. We tend to have this idea that any song could pop off at any time, but that's obviously not the case (cf. the silly fixation on nonexistent 'Roses' jams). They seem to come into individual songs with a general idea of their function in the set -- only on nights where they're all committed to *free* movement, or where one member's gonna insist on a step-change, do random songs seem to go long. Otherwise it's just the 'jam vehicles' for the most part.
I dunno.
Anyway, you're a horrible monster and so forth.
p.s. The 'hoodie' line is solid gold.
As a maniacally devoted fan, you are allowed to see hidden patterns and meanings in song choices and sequences where none actually exist, you can arbitrarily decide when it is better to be either precise and boring or sloppy and ambitious, but don't you EVER give a bad show a bad review.
There's a small chance I would have continued reading if the reviewer's personal connection to the band was illustrated by wearing the same scarf as Mike.
Personally I give nights 1 and 2 4-star ratings for all the great moments they had (and night 3 was awesome enough to be a 5-star). Maybe I'm being generous due to the many shows earlier this year that were so lackluster in comparison; who knows. But I like what they've been doing since Dick's, fall tour, Vegas, etc. and am optimistic about next year.
What's that you say? Trey was struggling with the compositions and making major mistakes? Those weren't mistakes man. Trey NEVER makes mistakes. He was improvising. That's all. It actually sounded really good. It's your ears that are bad. Get with the program!!
We should all work together as a community and admire someones courage for writing a review. There is no need to put each other down about their opinions. It is ok to disagree, however Be Kind, I think John Mayer said that, don;t remember...
Final thoughts-
I'm vibrating with love and light
Pulsating with love and light
In a world gone bad, a world gone bad,
There must be something more than this
I'm vibrating with love and light
Pulsating with love and light
In a world gone bad, a world gone bad,
There must be something more than this[/i]
I have always used music as an outlet for pain, both physical and mental. You never know what kind of day, week, month, year anyone has had. I learned never to judge, anything or anything. I find myself at shows loving the same song I have heard numerous times before, but this time it hits me with a different energy. Funny, bc I was teased for disliking antelope, it was only bc it meant the Set was over, I love the song and boy do they rock it out! They rocked out this entire run, and I am so sad im not going to Mexico. This has been a rough year for me, (and everyone else) and no joke, my life has been saved by rock and roll and Dan(the chillest man). I missed hanging with my friends at these shows, bouncin energy and endless smiles off each other. Seeing familiar faces would have been a walk down memory lane of different shows, places, etc, would have been nostalgic. However, the energy for these runs and the endless smiles hit a new level for me. Thank you phriends and phish. Being with everyone you love and loving the music is something a couch tour doesn't let you experience. You guys were amazing! My favorite part of the garden party, and it makes me so happy is looking around and seeing EVERYONE dancing and moving. What other band can make you feel at Home when you experience that. Happy 2017! First time blogger, on the phish.net. (Included a link to my picture I wanted to attach)
https://www.instagram.com/p/BO2pz82AApDqr6foLDeqIctBRYUi8390ITdpdw0/?taken-by=saragoose9
As for this review, I don't even get the title? ...To0 late to save a drowning PHISH? Did you have fun and enjoy yourself? You may prefer an evening with grandma dining on fiddle faddle as you dive deep into the odyssey of old Donahue re-runs. I have seen Phish over 100 times over 27 years and can honestly say that I have NEVER seen a bad show or one I would even attempt to criticize. You are the wrong man for the job.