This will undoubtedly be lost in the shuffle, but I enjoyed the review and was actually surprised/shocked to see the cavalcade of people losing their cool about it. Not just that, seeing people downvoted for saying it was a good review. What the hell?

A few things:

1) If you had an awesome time at a show and someone says it wasn't the best show by the band, who cares? You had an awesome time - do you really need the cherry on top that is some stranger validating your opinion?

2) If I was more eloquent in my late teens and forced to submit a review to a website by the next morning, I would have written a similarly non-purple review of the show I attended on 10/02/99 or 02/20/2003. At the time, I was really let down by both of those shows and it would have shown. Lo and behold, seventeen and fourteen years later, I'd give a left nut (I have two) to revisit either of those shows for just one of what I now believe are multiple canonical jams.

What I'm saying is; maybe in time, the reviewer will come to see things the way you do. Or, maybe you'll see things the way he does.

3) The Lions suck.