Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
Some brainstorms that happened as I was reading the article about some ratings-related things the raw numbers would help suss out:
- Are different eras consistently rated higher/lower than others? I'd love to see a histogram (or a bell curve generated using a historgram) of the ratings for shows by era
- Are different years consistently rated higher/lower than others? Same idea as the first one, but by year instead of era.
- Is it possible to drill down to all of the individual ratings of particular shows? If so, are there certain shows that are more "polarizing" than others? i.e. shows whose ratings have a high Coefficient of Variation (or since the ratings scale is a consistent 0-5 for all shows, perhaps all you'd need to do is compare std. deviations). Conversely, are there some shows where the consensus is nearly unanimous and have a very tight cluster of ratings?
- Is it possible to track a show's average rating over time? I would be neat to try and take a quantitative look at "recency bias". Take a few shows that occured after the ratings system was put in place, and then bin the ratings within the first day, days 2-7, days 8-31, and days 31-365, or something like that.
Can't wait until next week's article!