Although Phish loves to surprise, and a song can pop up virtually anywhere ("Rocky Top" as an opener in Camden), songs do tend to gravitate towards a spot where they comfortable. Some seem to work better early on in the first set or mid-second set, or second set opener....whatever. While sometimes an unexpected placement can lead to pleasing results ("Makisupa Policeman" as an encore), other times, placements can be kind of jarring. Such as the case when "Alaska" dropped mid-second set inMerriweather on Sunday. Not a bad song but certainly one that is looking for the right spot. Performed 19 times since its debut on 2009-06-09 in Asheville, almost evenly split between first set and second set (9 times and 10 times respectively). It has never been an encore, a set opener, or a set closer nor has it followed or preceded another tune more than twice. So where's the best spot for "Alaska"? First set early? Show opener? After a ripping 20 minute "Type II" jam fest? As the lyrics say, "Digging down deep, I don't understand it, but I ain't losing sleep."
While the graphic is certainly tounge in cheek, what are your thoughts on "Alaska"?
EDIT: I suck at Venn Diagrams. Of course it makes no sense. Was trying to show slightly more Set II Alaskas and a very tiny proportion of totality that didn't ruin flow of set. I think this would have been easier to understand:
If you liked this blog post, one way you could "like" it is to make a donation to The Mockingbird Foundation, the sponsor of Phish.net. Support music education for children, and you just might change the world.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
I don't ever hear 'set list killing" songs... songs that are slow give an old beat-up body like mine a chance to not stroke out...
Worst spot: At a show I'm not at.
The first set can be 90 min meatstick> YEM or something and set 2 ballads and 'songs'
come on, all deadheads know how predictable it all became.. oh drums space in the second set, the song outta space, the dylan spot... jezz
That being said, in my opinion, Alaska, like Ocelot kinda falls into the general type of Grateful Dead feel that the band openly acknowledged avoiding prior to 3.0. That plodding song form that both carry is a relatively new element of Phish's sound and I just don't think they get that while Ocelot is a pretty great song, Alaska just isn't interchangeable.
There have been more SetI II Alaskas than Set I Alaskas because the green circle is bigger... And... Some Alaskas, the good Alaskas, are the ones that are at once in set I AND in set II??
I missed those ones, which I'm a bit bummed about. Are AUDs to be found?
'[||]^[||]'
%
\___/
BTW, a "had to be there show" is a show that someone is overrating because they had a really great time at it, and doesn't understand that personal enjoyment of a show is not incompatible with reasoned perspective that puts that show in the context of literally a thousand-plus other shows, and concludes that the show in question is, say, average or below average. The recognition that a show is not as good as others that week or that tour or that year does not need to threaten your memories of the great time you had. Your personal experience is not cheapened or assaulted by the historical reality of that particular show being weak in comparison to great shows. In order to recognize a show's relative merits, it is not necessary for you to somehow reject or revise your personal experience of a great time--so just relax. If someone offers a critical assessment of a show that concludes it is below average, and you were there and had a great time and don't understand how anyone could view it as anything but the greatest thing that's ever happened, the chances are quite likely that you, in fact, are the one who "doesn't get it," not the critic. And that's perfectly fine--there's room for a wide range of experiences. It's just interesting that the ones who get the most inflamed about "haters" are actually the only ones going around telling other people what to think and rejecting others' experience of a show. Think about it.
Merriweather's second set looked odd on paper. Only those who were there can really say if everything went together, or it was a hodge-podge of songs bunched together.
I really don't care when they play Alaska, as long as it fits in. The jamming potential is what's great about the song.
I echo the calls for Ocelot, though. I LOVE that song. I'd much rather see Ocelot opened up than Alaska.
In response to DBNick, I also like Ocelot, but not as much. I LOVED the TAB arrangement of Ocelot on his most recent tour. If Phish could do that, I think it would be an amazing song, jammed out or not. But I think Trey will likely keep that arrangement for TAB (though maybe we'll see some horns with Phish and they will pull that off).
The size of the circles are irrelevant, as is the size of the overlap. I suppose what the graph is saying is that no version of the song would not be a set-killer as it is impossible for a song to exist in both sets. Unless they start it at the end of the first set and stop it halfway thru and then complete it when they come back out for set 2?
Or maybe it is like Schrödinger's song? It exists in both sets at all times until you actually hear the show?
Alaska is a great song. Worcester2 with the Palin voicebox is the version to get.
Phish is great. Love most everything they do. And I think I could even grow to like Alaska given the right time and placement, which very well may be different given circumstances of show. Just my opinion so far that that it hasn't worked for me. It doesn't mean I need to take time off from Phish. Nor does it mean that I am not allowed an opinion on a show I was not at. I have listened to every minute of every show since Hampton and think I trust my ear to know what I like. And again, that's the great thing about Phish. I absolutely love Halfway to the Moon and think it's going to be a huge fan favorite and an important component in many second sets in the future. Many don't like it. That's fine. I still hope they play it at the next show I'm at. That's simply my opinion.
This was not helpful at all as Phish news goes.
It's Phish's Tennesee Jed. It belongs in the middle of the second set, right after Queen Jane Approximately.
Those are both 1st set songs. Maybe a 2nd set Jed in the 70's. And QJA in the 2nd set??? ever??"
Oh God dammit. Typo.
And that was certainly not news. As written, it was just a tongue in cheek graphic to spur conversation about a song from Phish, because as you know, this is a Phish site. That's what we do here. Lot's of people seem to love it anywhere, many hate it anywhere, many think it would be best early in a first set, or outdoors, or as an encore. All valid opinions and I've enjoyed hearing different people's takes on it (especially the interesting Tennesse Jed comparison).
Funny thing, you could take literally ANY Phish tune, and write a couple paragraphs about it, and get wildly different responses: love it, hate it, best ever, worst ever, etc.
As far as what set, I could really care less where a song is played. If Phish played my 15 favorite songs one night I wouldn't give a flying fluck what order they came in. Greatest night ever no matter what. I like a set to flow as much as anyone but never felt the band blew this so badly I needed to complain about it.
-You cant see a moose when your settin on a plane-
Probably going to get our forbin> mockingbird at superball. SInce I've been chasing it I hope it's tasty with some narration...
Second, yeah, I don't think I'm going to find a new band if I haven't enjoyed the placement of one of their songs but still think it has potential. Shit, if that was the case, I would have bailed after my first Guelah Papyrus.
You have your bra in a bunch, no need to get your panties there too.